Alpine+Peer+Assessment

IMPORTANT MESSAGE:  Kayla, and Jasmine from B block and Charlie, Chun and Ernie from C block need to post their Peer Assessment to the Boreal Peer Assessment page or suffer grave consequences. ** Tundra Group Peer Assessment for Alpine **


 * Biome Introduction**: 1 pt
 * Needs more background knowledge
 * Doesn’t draw us in. got boring
 * No interactive map
 * Good picture
 * 3 Distinct locations**: 10 pt
 * Not enough information
 * Only has 2/3 locations
 * Needs more pictures
 * Food Webs**: 3 pts
 * Very well mapped food webs
 * Missing one
 * Didn’t describe any of them
 * Highlighted Species**:1 pt
 * Has picture but doesn’t describe them separately or thoroughly
 * Climate & Terrain Descriptions**:2 pt
 * Describes climate well
 * Missing Terrain information <- Very important
 * Layout, Design, & Grammar**: 0 pts
 * Disorganized and confusing
 * No TOC
 * No hyperlinks
 * Messy headings
 * Research Integration**:1pt
 * Very few parenthetical citations
 * No video or audio
 * Citing/ Intellectual Property/ Copyright**:2pt
 * Some pictures link back and some don’t

Apline peer assessment

Biome introduction: 2/5pts No map of locations,

3 distinct locations /15pts Your information about the locations are spread out all over the place and I think it would help if you put them close to eachother or in the same general area. Food webs 3 /5pts You have a 2 good food web. It says you need some for all locations

Nd I cant tell if there is a foodweb for the other ones. Highlited species 2/5mpts You have animals that are good but there is no importance for it. Climate and terrain descriptions 2/5pts You didn’t really explain a whole lot about the climate. It seems all you described were the pictures and others Layout: 2/5pts All of your information is spread all over the place. You need to put it all in the same place. It is really unorganized. You didn’t really explain anything.

Alpine Peer Assesment Biome Introduction 1/5 -Is not very thorough. While it does attract possible customers more facts would be better. -We couldn’t find an interactive map. If you’re looking for a good one check Wikipedia they always have some good ones. 3 Distinct Locations 5/15 -We could only find two locations listed on your wiki. -There were suggestions in one of the locations which did add to the article. I suggest adding more. -We didn’t see many images or videos. Check out Google Images and Youtube and you’ll find some great stuff. Food Webs 3/5 -You had two food webs that were decent but we couldn’t quiet figure what they were for. I suggest using the caption feature on the image. Highlighted Species 0/5 -There was one animal indicated on the wiki with minimal information. Climate & Terrain Descriptions 1/5 -Information provided for the Himalaya was very good. -Missing information for the Andes Layout, Design, & Grammar 0/5 -We found the page tough to navigate -I suggest adding a Table of Contents which would help. Research Integration 0/5 -We couldn’t find many citations. Use Noodletools it rocks! -There wasn’t much interactive media either. As mentioned above try searching YouTube. Citing / Intellectual Property / Copyright 1/5 - We didn’t find any citations. Use noodletools! -Most Images linked back however try to remove linking to Google Images Collaboration 3/10 Points -Not many recent posts created in the discussion forum. -Does not seem all members contributed equally.