Temperate+Rain+Forest+Peer+Assessment

Enter comments here:

Temperate Rain Forest Peer Assement: Chris Kelley and Josh Martin Biome Introduction: There was no introduction. 0-5 points 3 distinct locations: There were only 2 locations, and they were described pretty badly,5-15 points Food Web: Food Web was good and had a good desription 5-5points Highlighted Species: There were not enough and had brief description 2-5 points Climate and Description: You barely had a complete sentence and didn’t have enough info on the climate. 2-5 Points Layour, grammar: layout IS OK, not complete, design is ok. 3-5 points Research integration: cited some stuff, good amount of pictures 4-5 points Citing: gave some citations, images, and the links work. 4-5 points Collaboration: uitilizedthe comments and posts section. Ok editing. 7-10 points

temperate rainforest biome peer assement

biome introduction : 0/5pts - you need a interactive map indicating location of the biome with a caption and a paragraph

- a into paragraph 3 distinct locations : 5/15 pts - two beaches?

- need two maybe one more distinct locations

- no videos

- need itineraries and suggestions food webs : 4.99/5pts

E BLOCK :

__ Temperate Rain Forest __ Ended with: 34/60
 * Biome Introduction: 0/5pts. – Didn’t have background knowledge of biome or introduction does not include interesting info or vivid imagery that draws (me) the traveler in. Also did not have a map of the biome.
 * 3 Distinct Locations: 5/15pts. – Does not have 3 distinct locations only that travlers can visit. Also did not suggest that any travler should visit there location. No maps, some photos, no videos and some additional infermation.
 * Food Webs: 5/5pts. – Had a very good descriptive food web.
 * Highlighted Species: 4/5pts. – Highlighted specific organisms and added a descrpition but did not add it’s imporatance to the environment.
 * Climate & Terrain Descrpitions: 4/5pts. – Added climate and described it but did not add precipitation nor seasons but had facts and details
 * Layout, Design, & Grammer: 2/5pts. Wasn’t really creative and didn’t have much desripiton on the page. No hyperlinks, Some headings, no table of contents and no indexes. Some mistakes.
 * Reasearch Interaction: 5/5pts. – Showed that they researched and had parenthetical citations.
 * Citing/ Intellectual Property/ Copyright: 0/5pts. – Had none of the requirements needed.
 * Collaboration: 9/10pts. – Did not use editing tools effectivly.